|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
   |
Posted - 2011.03.09 18:42:00 -
[1]
It's pointless to vote for other issues before fixing the iskbank issue
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.09 20:42:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Ms PacMan on 09/03/2011 20:47:24
 Originally by: Gertrud ToD
how is this related to renters?
how do you think you can fix this?
Originally by: Mister Rocknrolla
Edited by: Mister Rocknrolla on 09/03/2011 19:43:29
Originally by: other thread
ALLIANCE CORPCOUNT CHARCOUNT US$
--------------------------------------------------------------
Wildly Inappropriate. 8 12 $5,050.12
Vera Cruz Alliance 3 7 $3,276.49
Cascade Associates 2 6 $2,489.38
Goonswarm Federation 6 8 $2,222.43
-Mostly Harmless- 5 11 $1,891.67
Freelancer Coalition 2 3 $1,754.85
Imperial 0rder 4 6 $1,436.72
C0NVICTED 2 5 $1,390.82
Shadow of xXDEATHXx 1 2 $1,369.98
The Devil's Warrior Alliance 1 3 $1,272.18
Candidate comments?
These Real Money Trades RMT and the list of of who bought isk this way and how it is related to renters...
Here's my view on this:
The isk that they sell has to come from somewhere.
I assume they also sell PLEX for real money but then cheaper than CCP does.
This is a speculation:
They invested buying isk in order to create such a power in game so they can create a powervacuum.
Next is they make 'settlements' by alliances renting space from them.
The area's they control will get so large and the isk income will get so high that they will be able to whitewash these isk's for real money and make huge profits.
How they whitewash it can be various.
Rentspace /settlements will prevent anyone to get access to nullsec any other way than renting space.
Any other way, say PVP, will be a fight like Papuans vs the Russian Army.[/i]
By replacing the current way systems are being rented out for a by CCP controlled rent-system , like in game rent-slots (and put a limit on the number of slots) and edit the EULA that any other way to rent out space to others will be a violation of the EULA you can break open this vacuum.
Now larger numbers of corps and alliances from empire won't be 'Papuans' anymore and can actually fight their way into nullsec and obtain space.
While they obtain more space the powerblocks will lose more ways of making income (R64/R32)
More numbers of indepandants in nullsec will cause to make it harder for the powerblocks to maintain their (illegal) way of making (real) money.
A perfect example of this in real life is currently Libia and the revolt that is going on their against Kadaffi.
He controlled his 'nullsec' and made trillions of oil dollars but now the people are taking over. In a even more wider aspect it happened in Tunesia and Egypt first, with success.
What CCP has to do right now is to freeze all these people's (corp) wallets while they are being investigated (the people who are being listed buying isk in violation of the EULA).
Note that i am not accusing any alliance about the above.
I leave the answers to that to CCP
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.10 01:15:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Di Mulle
Ironically enough, your Libya analogue pretty demonstrates what things you are not getting. People are "taking over" not because some higher authority changed an EULA for Kaddafi and he ran out of "oil slots".
This part you are mixing up.
To be more clear,
In the last 2 years the player-base increased significantly.
A lot of these players should be made able to 'storm' into nullsec.
Meanwhile you have to limit the options for the "umbrella alliance" in his ways to rent out space but. You will need to give them this option for now at least for a transition period of time.
About Kadaffi, and "oil slots" Kadaffi already cashed trillions of dollars/euros, the people will take over 'his' country, his source of constant income. Meanwhile countries are freezing his bank accounts.
In Eve, people have to take space massively and CCP should freeze the (corp) wallets of every individual that is under investigation.
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.12 16:29:00 -
[4]
Today Ms PacMan will be interviewed by Eve Uni (approx 19.00 hrs Evetime) and will also be one of the four guests at debate 4 of lostineve
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.12 19:51:00 -
[5]
I thank Eve Uni for their time, you are a great group of people.
I enjoyed being with you taking and answering your questions
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.13 01:07:00 -
[6]
I thank lostineve.net for having me at debate 4.
Podcast of this debate will be released monday march 15.
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.14 23:09:00 -
[7]
here's the podcast of debate #4 hosted by Lost in Eve.net where i was one of the four guests
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
|
Posted - 2011.03.18 00:25:00 -
[8]
i plead for a different way of elections for next year:
I like to see a new setup:
4 CSM candidates get into CSM by players votes
3 CSM candidates will get into CSM by 'Jury' (CCP), based on any criteria that the Jury may have.
2 CSM members of the current running CSM can get pushed forward by the other councillors (internal vote) for continuation purposes. (rule: The CSM members that made use of this option cannot make use of this option twice in a row)
* more guarantee on quality of CSM
* less chance on 'CSM blocks'
* improved continuation
* not everyone with the best skills and plans are capable running campaign as it should or lack campaigning skills.
Pick by Jury will be fair for this group of candidates.
|
Ms PacMan
Caldari
Eye of God
United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.22 12:21:00 -
[9]
Last call to vote!
Vote through this link
|
|
|
| |
|